How science fools us

Modern science makes itself highly ridiculous, at least for self-thinking people. You need proof? Here it is!

Mercury, dotted with typical cratering impacts, at least if we are to believe the modern cosmology. (Copyright: NASA / Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory / Carnegie Institution of Washington, Source:

This exemplary example of modern science (here specifically only cosmology!) shows us at least three things very clear:

  • 1) No matter how stupid and illogical scientific theories are, they are as ever easy believed by the people, because science can not err?!?!
  • 2) Today's science is already again become as dogmatic as it was in the Middle Ages, when the truth was ignored and repressed.
  • 3) How important skepticism is (also against established perspectives) and simple, common sense.

So here is the evidence:

It's about lunar craters, whether on the satellite of the Earth or other planets, all of them are heavily cratered and almost all lunar craters were explained by the impact of meteorites (Source: Wiki).

You can see this very nice on our moon, but also to other celestial objects, and all these craters have one thing in common: They have a circular shape and no remains of meteors, see the introductory picture of Mercury.

A circular crater shape is created without any doubt if a more or less circular meteorite impact perpendicular to the surface. But what a probability is that all meteorites are more or less circular and all strike perpendicular to the surface and even all disappear without a trace? Please look at the image of Mercury again very closely, all craters have circular shapes and contain any remnants of meteorites!!!

The vast majority of meteorites should definitely not hit with exactly 90 degrees to the surface, they should have a shape deviating from the spherical shape and it should still be seen a few remnants?!?! And therefore also very different craters or crater forms should be seen on the moon surface, if this crater are meteoroid impacts.

So the current theory of crater formation is quite obvious nonsense and most of people believe it without any reflection.

And it's your turn, to answer the question, whether our modern cosmologists are really so stupid, not to realize that, or that they maybe have other reasons, to remain silent about this obvious madness.

plasma cosmoloyAnd yes, there is a simple and logical alternative theory, which is steadfastly ignored by modern cosmology. And this  alternative theory can not only explain this and many other phenomena, but also underpin with physical evidence.

Because this universe consists not only of dust and the prevailing force is not gravity, but this is an "electric universe" full of plasma, in which act primarily electromagnetic forces. I have explained it further in my article "Sensation: Modern Physics Proves Theosophical cosmology" from a theosophical perspective with further informations.



2 Kommentar(e)

Bild des Benutzers Sampsa

This plasma cosmology is interesting, because on surfaces of the planets there are many strange looking forms, which are difficult to be explained by geology or by meteor impacts.

But I have read that huge plasma currents are electrically neutral, so then they could not cause radical changes to surfaces of planets.

About the meteor craters. It is said that in spite of the angle, the crater will likely be circular, because the impact is like a bomb explosion. And the crater is always bigger than the meteor, because the soil around will collapse.

It is said that the shape of the crater may be exceptional in case that the meteor arrives in small angle (about 10–15 degrees) or if it has broken down to at least two parts. See examples here: and

As to the disappeared matter, it is possible that matter flies off from the crater or smelts. Some crunched meteor matter can often be found in the bottom of the crater. We know that some parts of meteors smelt already in the atmosphere of the Earth.

Bild des Benutzers Steven Otto

Thanks Sampsa for your comment, but where did you read that Sampsa? Plasma discharges were investigated for decades in many laboratorys and the most of surface shapes/characteristcs can explaned by it. It's like a flash, of course not neutral. It depends also on the material of the surface.

If the craters be circular, because the impact is like a bomb explosion, why most of them are flat? Look at the picture again. interesting pics, but look again on the merkury surface, all of that are circular, flat and without any remains, allmost all of it!

Of course, real meteor impacts exists, I don't deny it, but the most of surface attributes are not meteor impacts, evident.

One example, look here a Lichtenberg figur and then here , the Putorana Plateau from space or here , hope you get it, because this is not an accident or a isolated case, all of that and many more you can explain with plasma cosmology.

Neuen Kommentar schreiben

Plain text

  • Keine HTML-Tags erlaubt.
  • HTML - Zeilenumbrüche und Absätze werden automatisch erzeugt.
Diese Frage soll automatisierten Spam verhindern und überprüft, ob Sie ein menschlicher Besucher sind.
Geben Sie die Zeichen ein, die im Bild gezeigt werden.

International theosophy section

For more international theosophy related content on this site please visit the international theosophy section.

Um am Forum teilnehmen bzw. Inhalte kommentieren zu können musst Du Dich anmelden oder registrieren.

Bitte beachten

Diese Webpräsenz widmet sich dem Thema Theosophie (insbesondere im Rahmen der Geheimlehre von Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky) und ist zum Zweck der Bildung einer Theosophischen Gemeinschaft ins Leben gerufen worden. Hier finden sich zudem ein Theosophie-Forum und aktuelle Inhalte rund um das Thema Theosophie bzw. Tugenden und die Vernunftwerdung. Bei der Veröffentlichung von eigenen Inhalten beachte bitte einige Hinweise.

On this site you can also find an international theosophy section and the quarterly "International Theosophy World News"-Newsletter.