Precise science: Quo vadis - relativity theory

The GPS works, is often used as strong evidence of Einsteins Relativity theory. This evidence – meaning more precisely that for Einstein's time dilation – is based inter alia on identical clocks in GPS satellites. But contrary to common usage it means in the actual exact physics the equality of system (Time) and location (place). But this is totally impossible with two physical objects. Physically, there is and can’t be two identical clocks. So this is not evidence, but laughable if it were not so sad. So what should one think of a Theory, its mathematical formulas and apparent evidence, stating that the size of a body at the speed of light shrinks to zero, and – after this body has completely dissolved, because it has no spatial extent anymore – simultaneously its mass becomes infinite? What reasonable can be concluded when you limit time to the function of a watch and for different viewer due to different speeds, different flow rate of time or apply time travel as "proven"?1

Curvature of space? The room in itself is a rationally an emptiness, an abstraction, a nothing, invalid and no substantial object. And a curvature of an abstract term is against reason. You do not necessary have to doubt the in relation standing measurements of the "Curvature of space", but certainly the most singular interpretation. The space-time – the putative association of space and time in a four-dimensional space-time continuum, an existence which is neither physically provable nor mentally detectable – is now actually viewed by many as a physical reality.2

And that is also what the science has to say to this theory. It eludes the human cognitive framework and it peaks against any experience and logic. But to adopt a never-to-understand and illogical theory as true, means to blindly believe it. And these are the foundation of today's exact physical fundamental research, which was built on for the past century scientifically.

The theory of relativity is logical also the theory that since its consist has spawned the most criticism from scientific circles.3 This criticism is both in its quality and quantity of its adherents like to degraded or concealed. But the shocking truth is that Einstein's theory of relativity has long been scientifically refuted by many Sites as erroneous and impossible, and so thoroughly, that even the hundredth experimentally confirmed predictions can not change anything. Why is it still used as the basis of today's basic research is obvious – dogmatism.

1927 the energy balance in the decay of radium E was investigated, what resulted in 0.34 MeV (mega electron volts). After Einstein's Theory and its equations, it would have to be 1.05. Therefore, it was postulated new particles that later were called neutrinos, which in this case must declare the discrepancy between theory and practice. As one in the 1960s, could exactly determine velocities of the stars in galaxies, it was found that they did not move as predicted by Newton and Einstein.4

This later created the birth of dark matter, or in other words: If one distribute to the existing mathematic formulas enough mass to the galaxies around, one would get after some time also on the basis of Einstein Formulas the observed orbital velocities of the stars. Since this mass is nowhere detectable, it was named as "dark matter" and came up as a mystery. Soon, however, this invention for prolonging life of a long disproved hypothesis drew further problems, so that even dark energy had to be invented to rebalance the effect of dark matter in great. It ended at the current cosmological model, which contains less than 5% real observable matter. The rest is made up of about 2/3 dark energy and 1/3 dark matter. In addition, it would be a conventional model without dark matter, the formation of large-scale cosmic structures and take the galaxies much longer than the currently adopted age of the universe.

The theory of relativity has become the largest dogma of physics. And the dogmatism is what prevents the previously assumed to question theories or hypotheses, if their errors by practical measurement results clearly reveal in reality. That's why at such events always new theories are advised, leading to even greater contradictions. And after decades of such a crude development, abstruse concepts become acceptable, such as the string theory, which can seemingly explain a lot, but are neither physically provable nor ever understandable with a healthy sense (since man definitely can mentally not realize more than three dimensions).

  • 1. "It would seem, that all the definitions of 'time' concerned difficulties could be overcome, by setting instead of 'time' I am setting the position of the small hand of my watch.” This is A. Einstein's definition of time, taken from "On the Electrodynamics Moving Bodies ", I. Kinematic part, §1 definition of simultaneity. For a precise physics in this context, however, only time intervals are relevant and time points. Time describes briefly the sequence of events.
  • 2. Hermann Minkowski (1864-1909), it is due to this idea that made it clear that "space-time" is a purely mathematical consideration, s. Minkowskis Space and time from 1909 annual report of the German Mathematical Society, S.75-88. To consider the difference between two points in a coordinate system as an additional dimension, also has quite evidently nothing to do with reality, read more in "The Physics of nothingness – Why Big Bang, relativity and quantum mechanics failed" Raphael Haumann, 2012 S. 194 f. (only in German), from this are some facts as well as some others here.
  • 3. E.g..: "On the absolute size of the special theory of relativity - a documentary thought experiment about 95 years of criticism (1908-2003) with the detection of 3,789 critical works "by G. O. Mueller (only in German).
  • 4. That is also the refutation of the assumption of the universality of gravity, but even this has its validity today.

Um am Forum teilnehmen bzw. Inhalte kommentieren zu können musst Du Dich anmelden oder registrieren.

Bitte beachten

Diese Webpräsenz widmet sich dem Thema Theosophie (insbesondere im Rahmen der Geheimlehre von Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky) und ist zum Zweck der Bildung einer Theosophischen Gemeinschaft ins Leben gerufen worden. Hier finden sich zudem ein Theosophie-Forum und aktuelle Inhalte rund um das Thema Theosophie bzw. Tugenden und die Vernunftwerdung. Bei der Veröffentlichung von eigenen Inhalten beachte bitte einige Hinweise.

On this site you can also find an international theosophy section and the quarterly "International Theosophy World News"-Newsletter.